Archive for February, 2012

“To the Power of Three”, Laura Lippman

Friday, February 24th, 2012

Pros: A complex murder mystery involving a remarkable web of personalities
Cons: Not really the “suspense” the book cover would have us believe; most of these characters are seriously non-likable
Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Also posted on Epinions.com

 

Kat, Perri, and Josie have been inseparable friends since third grade. They had their own place largely outside the school’s clique-based structure. Everyone loved Kat for her beauty and kindness. Josie is an athletic cheerleader. And Perri’s the sharp-witted theater geek. They live in a well-to-do suburb and their families can afford good schools, special athletics programs, and more. But as the end of their senior year draws close, one of them brings a gun to school. One girl ends up dead. One gets shot in the foot. And one is in critical condition after apparently blowing half of her face off. Only the three of them knew what really happened in the school bathroom that morning, only one girl is capable of saying, and she’s sticking to a story that doesn’t quite hold water. Now everyone’s looking for answers: the police, who can’t let go of the pieces that don’t add up; the father of the dead girl, who wants someone to blame; and the parents of the girl who’s still in critical condition, because they want some proof, any proof, that it might not have been her terrible act that caused all of this tragedy.

(more…)

“If You See Her,” Shiloh Walker

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

Pros: So totally in tears! An emotional roller-coaster tied to a dark mystery and some wonderful characters
Cons:
Rating: 5 out of 5

 

Hope Carson is a survivor of domestic abuse, still battling her demons and trying to get her feet under her. It was her terrible luck to try to piece her life back together while visiting her friend Law, whose small town has just become the site of a terrible killing. As if that weren’t enough, Law was attacked and Hope was made to look as though she’d tried to kill both him and herself.

It takes golden-boy local DA Remy Jennings a while to catch up to the fact that she’s innocent. He feels it in his gut, but he also knows he’s having trouble remaining objective about her, and that means he needs to be particularly careful about basing his decisions only on the evidence at hand. Thankfully that evidence does eventually turn up, leaving him free to think about whether or not to pursue his interest in her. He knows she comes with baggage, maybe more than he can handle. But he just can’t seem to stay away from her.

Unfortunately for both of them, Hope’s ex-husband, the one who battered her, the one who tried to convince Remy she was violent and manipulative, now knows where she is. And he’s determined to bring her back home, no matter what he has to do to accomplish it. He isn’t counting, however, on an unlikely protector who doesn’t want to see Hope hurt…

(more…)

“Hunter’s Rise,” Shiloh Walker

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

Pros: Sexy, gripping story
Cons:
Rating: 5 out of 5

Review book (uncorrected proof) provided by the author
Expected publication date: April 3, 2012

 

Century-old vampire Sylvia is a mercenary who prefers a certain kind of work. This time her task is to kill a pedophile who escaped human justice. She isn’t a Hunter, and usually she manages to skate under their radar. This time, however, they need to stop her. If they don’t, they’ll never find out what happened to the several other children the man might have kidnapped, and Hunter/werewolf Toronto wants that closure for their families. After all, he knows what it’s like not to have answers—he was found as a teenager being attacked by five werewolves, and he has no memory of who he was before that.

When Toronto decides that the best way to beat Sylvia is to join her, the two find themselves reluctantly teaming up to find a monster. They’re both loners, however, and the situation seems to keep spiraling out of control into ever-larger messes. There’s evidence of a sex ring being run out of a high school. There’s a mad vampire running around who’s somehow managed to avoid the notice of the local Hunters. And both Sylvia and Toronto are about to get bitten by their respective pasts…

(more…)

“Beating Asthma,” Stephen Apaliski, MD

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012

Pros: Clear guidelines to help you figure out how to help yourself
Cons: One or two details I was uncertain of or wanted more info on
Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Review book provided courtesy of the publisher
Visit the companion website

 

Dr. Stephen Apaliski’s Beating Asthma: Seven Simple Principles is designed to help you take control of your asthma problems (or, as Apaliski likes to say, take “ownership” of them). He firmly believes that unless you build a strong collaborative relationship with your doctor—preferably a specialist—and do everything you can to control this chronic disease, you’re likely to end up at its mercy rather than in control of it. Part of the problem is that when you have asthma, your lung function can be dropping before you even notice it. By the time you experience wheezing, coughing, and tightness of breath, you’re well beyond the point where you could (potentially) have easily staved off the acute problems. Since asthma can be deadly, this is a real problem. Proper maintenance care can result in far fewer ER visits, not to mention lower overall health care costs and better quality of life.

(more…)

“Cthulhu’s Reign” ed. Darrell Schweitzer

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012

Pros: Surprising level of success given the difficulty
Cons: It’s tough for an anthology to be perfect, and Lovecraftian horror is particularly difficult to write well
Rating: 4 out of 5

Review book courtesy of Penguin Group
Also posted on Epinions.com

 

Most Lovecraftian tales of the Old Ones only hint at what might happen after the Old Ones return. In Cthulhu’s Reign, 15 authors explore the notion of what it might be like when it actually happens. When R’lyeh rises, when Cthulhu walks the earth, when the shoggoth hunt and kill. When humans find themselves to be mere insects—or less—beneath the notice of their new dark gods.

(more…)

Dear Authors: On Amazon’s Editorial Reviews

Monday, February 20th, 2012

Yesterday I stumbled across this blog post about Amazon’s practice of putting editorial reviews (from Publishers Weekly and similar mags) above the book description on Amazon pages. The post’s author notes:

You may already know that book reviews can be extremely sweet, or bitter as a mouthful of moth balls. You may also know that a bad review can sit on your book page, festering, scaring readers away until it falls out of sight. But did you know there are some reviews that can be posted to the “Editorial Review” section of your Amazon book page without your consent?

I get that it’s frustrating to have these reviews show up before the product description; it certainly seems counter-productive. However, I had a growing sense of irritation with how the blogger presented this, and eventually I realized why.

An author who thinks that a bad review is going to sink their sales is an author who’s assuming readers are stupid.

Now, as a reader I agree that it’s ridiculous to have editorial reviews above the product description, but it has NOTHING to do with how the reviews might affect my buying decision. Instead, it’s because I have no interest in those reviews, and certainly not before I know anything about the book. I skip right past them to the product description because I want to know what the damn book is about. I’m far from the only reader who does this, so while the reviews should be annoying from the author’s perspective, they shouldn’t be viewed as the end of the world.

Now, let’s get to the other problem in the quoted paragraph up there. The assumption that a negative review “can sit on your book page, festering, scaring readers away”. Let me go back to the above point: you are assuming your readers are stupid. Readers are perfectly capable of reading a negative review and taking away from it, NOT “that person hates a book so I guess I would too,” but rather EITHER “this reviewer’s view tends to match mine/be the opposite of mine, so I’ll react accordingly” OR “this reviewer didn’t like a, b, or c, and those are things that bother me too/don’t bother me, so I’d not enjoy/enjoy this myself.”

I’m not just blowing hot air here. I have a reviews site that’s been active for years. I get to see the Amazon stats on which books sell via click-throughs and which don’t. Guess what? It has nothing to do with the rating I gave those books. People are reading the reviews and deciding for themselves via the details I provide whether they would like a book. Plenty of those click-through buys are of books I didn’t like. I’ve had people tell me straight out, “X doesn’t bother me the way it does you, so I’ll give this book a try; thanks for the info!”

I can tell you right now that the truly wise book PR people are quite well aware that reviews, no matter whether positive or negative, sell books as long as the reviewer explains her thoughts and feelings. When dealing with Penguin (they have some of the most professional PR folk I’ve had the pleasure of dealing with), I’ve sometimes found myself getting MORE of an author’s books after coming down hard on one of that author’s novels. Why? Because a strong negative opinion engenders discussion, which attracts attention, which gets the author’s name in front of more people, which sells books.

Sure, there will always be a few people who blindly do what a review tells them to, but frankly that works for you more than against you. More people tend to review books that they like than ones they don’t (the latter are just more memorable for you as authors). By and large, readers will read what they want to. They read reviews to get an idea of whether a book matches their needs. When you talk about a negative review destroying your sales, you are giving the reviewer far more power than she actually has, and you are assuming that your readers are fools who cannot think for themselves. Don’t do this if you want these people to buy your books—assume they can make their own decisions and act accordingly.

“Courts of the Fey,” eds. Greenberg & Davis

Friday, February 17th, 2012

Pros: Some truly good pieces
Cons: Some stories aren’t wholly memorable
Rating: 4 out of 5

Review book courtesy of Penguin Group

 

Courts of the Fey is an anthology of 12 stories about the Seelie and Unseelie courts of faeries edited by Martin H. Greenberg and Russell Davis. The down side of a many-author anthology is you aren’t likely to enjoy all the stories because there’s such a range of styles. The up side is that you can discover new authors you might enjoy. Some anthologies manage to include more “wow” stories than others; Courts of the Fey is better than, say, Is Anybody Out There?, but not quite as good as A Girl’s Guide to Guns and Monsters.

(more…)

“Is Anybody Out There?” ed. Gevers and Halpern

Wednesday, February 15th, 2012

Pros: Some enjoyable flights of fancy
Cons: Some stories that try too hard to be high-minded and end up being obtuse
Rating: 2.5 out of 5

Review book courtesy of Penguin Group
Also posted on Epinions.com

 

The universe is vast, and it’s hard to imagine that there isn’t at least one other intelligent race out there, if not many. So why have we seen no evidence of aliens? Do they deliberately hide themselves from us? Are they already among us? Do they keep us in quarantine? Do advanced civilizations inevitably destroy themselves? Are we too blind to recognize an alien when we see one? Is Anybody Out There? is a collection of 15 short stories about the possibilities of extra-terrestrial life within our universe, edited by Nick Gevers and Marty Halpern.

(more…)

“Angels’ Flight,” Nalini Singh

Tuesday, February 14th, 2012

Pros: Some of Ms. Singh’s best work yet, and that’s saying a lot
Cons:
Rating: 5 out of 5

Review book courtesy of Penguin Group

 

Nalini Singh’s Angels’ Flight is a collection of four novellas set in her unusual and fantastic Guild Hunter universe, in which the world has been ruled since time immemorial by inhuman, lethal angels and archangels, served by vampires and humans alike.

(more…)

“That Old Black Magic,” Michelle Rowen

Monday, February 13th, 2012

Pros: Love to see Darrak dealing with his insecurities; fascinating demonic/celestial politicking
Cons: Still would like a little more depth to some of the villains
Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Review book courtesy of Penguin Group
Also posted on Epinions.com

 

Eden’s unwanted black magic has started to manifest itself without her conscious direction—a particularly dangerous development, since any use of her magic darkens her soul. Darrak, for his part, is turning into something other than a demon thanks to feeding off of Eden’s celestial energy—something half-light and half-dark. And Lucifer has big plans for Eden, plans that will put Darrak in terrible danger. To make matters worse, Eden’s father has come to earth, but he’s in the hands of Malleus, the group that wants to destroy all supernatural beings. Their plans for him don’t really fall in line with that ostensibly noble goal. The machinations pile up one on top of the other, and somehow Eden and Darrak have to avoid being crushed between them…

(more…)