“No One Cares What You Had For Lunch,” Margaret Mason
Friday, February 22nd, 2008Pros: Clever, creative, useful, entertaining
Cons: Not a one
Rating: 5 out of 5
Pros: Clever, creative, useful, entertaining
Cons: Not a one
Rating: 5 out of 5
Pros: Fun to read; both encouraging and practical
Cons: Narrow audience
Rating: 5 out of 5
Pros: A bare-bones, up-to-date, highly useful reference tool for grammar and style issues
Cons: None
Rating: 5 out of 5
Technorati Tags: reference, book reviews, books, writing, editing, grammar, publishing
Pros: A playful, useful toy to help you loosen up and create; portable and quick; self-contained
Cons: None
Rating: 5 out of 5
Technorati Tags: Michael Michalko, reviews, writing, creativity, business, Thinkpak, Thinkertoys, brainstorming
Pros: An incredible range of inspiring exercises with many suggestions and fascinating anecdotes
Cons: Occasional confusions
Rating: 4.5 out of 5
Technorati Tags: Michael Michalko, book reviews, books, writing, creativity, business, Thinkertoys, brainstorming
Pros: The ultimate publication reference
Cons: None
Rating: 5 out of 5
Technorati Tags: Writer’s Market, book reviews, books, writing, publishing, publication, market listings
Pros: Fascinating guide to using your Holland code to find a career that’s right for you
Cons: Can’t easily take into account special circumstances
Rating: 5 out of 5
Technorati Tags: careers, book reviews, books, creativity, artistic, unconventional, Carol Eikleberry, Holland Codes, reviews
Pros: Incredibly thorough; will help you understand every aspect of the publishing business
Cons: May be demoralizing to those who think they understand what publishing is about
Rating: 5 out of 5
(more…)
Pros: So thick with information that I don’t even have an appropriate analogy for it
Cons: Very broad in nature
Rating: 5 out of 5
Technorati Tags: book reviews, books, publishing, reviews, write, Writer’s Digest, writers, writing, writing style
Pros: Breadth of scope; insider’s view of the publishing industry; widely applicable to different self-publishing needs
Cons: Lack of depth and specificity in some areas
Rating: 3.5 out of 5
(more…)