Link directory
Friday, January 12th, 2007Requests or submissions for links come in four basic varieties, I’ve found. First I should mention that I have a fairly automated links directory that allows folks to submit their own links, because we get so many link submissions that I just couldn’t keep up with it manually. (It already contains more than 1600 links; I’ve been collecting them for about 9 years now after all.) My main goal with that directory is to provide useful links to our readers, and I will only include links that fall into areas that I think might be of interest to our readers. This is pretty clear simply by the fact that there are only four major categories: research links, tabletop RPG links, computer RPG links, and writers’ links. The directory contains so many links that much further sub-categorization has been necessary to allow any sort of easy browsing; the briefest glance will make it clear that there are no single links at the top-level categories. Everything is further categorized.
So, those four types of link submissions. The rarest is the person who actually looks around, determines that their link is appropriate to the directory, finds a sub-category that makes sense for it, and submits it through the “submit new link” function there. I tend to approve these fairly quickly assuming I click through and the site looks relevant and functional.
The next is the person who totally ignores the fact that submissions for the directory are automated and emails me asking for a link. Since they apparently can’t even be bothered to look at the site before asking for a link, I might or might not write back to them depending on whether I feel like it, I have the time, and their link looks worthwhile. Of course, all I tell them is that they can go find the relevant category/sub-category in the directory and use the “submit new link” function to submit their link there.
Third is the person who submits their link, but dumps it in the top level category. I don’t know if these folks think their links should get special treatment and be listed above all others, or they just don’t care to put in the effort to find the relevant sub-category and figure that’s my job. Either way, these tend to sit around in my admin panel until I have absolutely nothing else to do–which can take quite a while. (If their link’s placement isn’t worth the time and effort to them, I don’t really see why it should be worth the time and effort to me. I have much better things to do.)
Finally, there are the links (and there are far more of them than I’d like to admit) that have nothing whatsoever to do with the directory. It’s hard to believe that with such a focused directory these people really think their links are going to get in, yet they still keep trying. Usually they stop after one or two tries, although of course I’ve gotten chewed out by some folks for daring to reject their links, which I always find amusing. Today I finally had to look up how to ban IP addresses because the same few types of links kept getting submitted over and over (and no, no matter how many times they try I’m not going to post get-rich-quick scheme links in a directory for writers and roleplayers).
Sigh…
Technorati Tags: links











