<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bookworm Carnival #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.errantdreams.com/thoughts/2007/08/13/bookworm-carnival-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.errantdreams.com/thoughts/2007/08/13/bookworm-carnival-2/</link>
	<description>"You never paint what you see or think you see. You paint with a thousand vibrations the blow that struck you."     --Nicholas de Stael</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www.errantdreams.com/thoughts/2007/08/13/bookworm-carnival-2/#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.errantdreams.com/thoughts/2007/08/13/bookworm-carnival-2/#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;dew:&lt;/b&gt; Simply because I really make an effort to have the reviews over at my reviews blog be complete and relatively polished, I won't review a book there that I haven't finished; it just doesn't feel right to me, although I can understand why someone else might handle that differently. If I was just chatting about it informally here, I wouldn't mind giving my opinion on a book that I hadn't finished as long as I noted that was the case (heh, like my comment in this post, in fact). I have on a couple of occasions been so utterly unable to finish a book that I didn't end up reviewing it, but most of the time I can manage; it helps that I try to avoid beginning a book unless I have reason to think it'll interest me in the first place, so not many of the books I pick up truly annoy me.

Part of the reason I can stand to finish this one, honestly, is because it's fairly easy to read quickly; it isn't as though it requires brain-power. I started it this morning and I'm at least 3/4 done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>dew:</b> Simply because I really make an effort to have the reviews over at my reviews blog be complete and relatively polished, I won&#8217;t review a book there that I haven&#8217;t finished; it just doesn&#8217;t feel right to me, although I can understand why someone else might handle that differently. If I was just chatting about it informally here, I wouldn&#8217;t mind giving my opinion on a book that I hadn&#8217;t finished as long as I noted that was the case (heh, like my comment in this post, in fact). I have on a couple of occasions been so utterly unable to finish a book that I didn&#8217;t end up reviewing it, but most of the time I can manage; it helps that I try to avoid beginning a book unless I have reason to think it&#8217;ll interest me in the first place, so not many of the books I pick up truly annoy me.</p>
<p>Part of the reason I can stand to finish this one, honestly, is because it&#8217;s fairly easy to read quickly; it isn&#8217;t as though it requires brain-power. I started it this morning and I&#8217;m at least 3/4 done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dew</title>
		<link>http://www.errantdreams.com/thoughts/2007/08/13/bookworm-carnival-2/#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>dew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.errantdreams.com/thoughts/2007/08/13/bookworm-carnival-2/#comment-2346</guid>
		<description>I'm still trying to figure out some kind of policy about books I don't want to finish. It seems unfair to the author to review a book without finishing it, even though the author will never see the review. It also seems like  waste of time (when I barely have time to keep up with my reading!) to finish a crappy book. But your point is a good one, too. I don't know. I'm still taking it case by case. So far I've reviewed two unfinished books, admitting I didn't finish them. I've also not reviewed two unfinished books. And I've finished books I didn't want to finish only if they were for challenges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still trying to figure out some kind of policy about books I don&#8217;t want to finish. It seems unfair to the author to review a book without finishing it, even though the author will never see the review. It also seems like  waste of time (when I barely have time to keep up with my reading!) to finish a crappy book. But your point is a good one, too. I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;m still taking it case by case. So far I&#8217;ve reviewed two unfinished books, admitting I didn&#8217;t finish them. I&#8217;ve also not reviewed two unfinished books. And I&#8217;ve finished books I didn&#8217;t want to finish only if they were for challenges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
